top of page

Argentina's Bailout and Colombia's Tariffs: The Two Pillars of Trump's Renewed Latin America Policy

  • Writer: Juan Allan
    Juan Allan
  • Oct 20
  • 3 min read

The US's strategic $20 billion support for Argentina, contrasted with tariff threats against Colombia, marks a recalibrated policy prioritizing ideological allies and hardline tactics in Latin America


ree

The United States is executing a recalibrated Latin America strategy, leveraging economic power to bolster ideological allies and confront adversaries. The cornerstone of this policy is a $20 billion currency swap for Argentina, a direct investment in the political survival of President Javier Milei, a fervent ideological partner of the Trump administration. 


This supportive stance stands in stark contrast to the coercive diplomacy deployed against Colombia, where the U.S. has threatened severe tariffs and cut aid, highlighting a dual-track approach to reasserting influence in its strategic backyard .


The Argentine Anchor


The U.S. lifeline to Argentina is framed as a strategic investment in a shared free-market philosophy. President Donald Trump has been explicit that American generosity is contingent on Milei remaining in power, stating, “If he wins, we’re staying with him... And if he doesn’t win, we’re gone”. This support is designed to stabilize Argentina's economy after inflation eased from its extreme highs, validating Milei's "chainsaw" approach to public spending and regulation.


For the U.S., a stable and friendly Argentina is a geopolitical asset. The country possesses large deposits of key minerals like lithium and copper, critical to U.S. manufacturing and securing supply chains away from competitors like China. Administration officials view strong relations with Milei as a vital bulwark against Beijing's growing influence in South America.


A Contrasting Approach: Pressure on Colombia


Simultaneously, the U.S. has adopted a confrontational stance towards Colombia, a historically key ally. The friction escalated when President Trump labeled Colombian President Gustavo Petro an “illegal drug leader” and vowed to end aid payments and impose new tariffs. This followed Petro's condemnation of U.S. military strikes on boats in the Caribbean, which his government called a "direct threat to national sovereignty" after a Colombian alleged fisherman was killed. The U.S. defense department claimed the strikes targeted vessels linked to drug cartels and Colombian rebel groups .


The Trump administration's threat is economically significant; the U.S. is Colombia's largest trading partner, accounting for 35% of its exports. This hardline position is presented as a necessary response to record-high coca cultivation in Colombia and a government perceived as insufficiently committed to the drug war. 


The strategy aims to force cooperation through economic pressure, though analysts warn it risks alienating a crucial security partner during a worsening security crisis in the Andes.


The Regional Context


This two-pronged strategy must be viewed against the ongoing crisis in Venezuela, which serves as a backdrop for U.S. policy. The Maduro regime presides over a profound humanitarian emergency, with over 20 million Venezuelans in poverty and brutal repression of dissent, creating regional instability and migration flows. The U.S. has increased pressure on Venezuela, including authorizing covert operations and strikes on vessels allegedly transporting drugs.


For the U.S. market and geopolitical position, these moves are framed as essential for national interest. A pro-U.S. Argentina provides access to critical resources and a partner for regional diplomacy. Taking a firm line with Colombia and Venezuela is portrayed as a direct effort to combat the flow of illegal narcotics, a priority for the American public. 


The US Market Stability


The initial market reaction to Milei's reforms and international backing has been positive. Argentina has seen a notable rebound in business sentiment, and the government's recent announcement of a sovereign debt buyback, funded by multilateral agencies, spurred a jump in its dollar bonds. The OECD projects GDP growth of 5.2% in 2025, citing a "turning point" for the Argentine economy.


However, economists warn the stabilization model is vulnerable. The government's reliance on an artificially strong peso to curb inflation has compromised the trade surplus and discouraged vital export income.


In any case, while the tariff threats introduce an element of trade uncertainty, the administration calculates that the long-term benefit of a cooperative hemisphere, free from the instability of failed states and hostile influences, will foster a more secure and prosperous economic environment for the United States.

Comments


bottom of page