Which is the Best Crypto Wallet in 2025? Backpack vs. MetaMask vs. Phantom
- Juan Allan
- Oct 21
- 4 min read
What is the best crypto wallet in 2025? We compare Backpack, MetaMask, and Phantom head-to-head. Discover why Backpack’s xNFTs make it the top choice for Web3
The "wallet wars" are defining the future of Web3. A crypto wallet is no longer just a digital vault to store Bitcoin or Ethereum; it's your passport, your identity, and your primary interface for the decentralized internet. In 2025, the competition is fiercer than ever.
While countless wallets exist, the battle for dominance is crystalizing around three major players: the incumbent MetaMask, the Solana specialist Phantom, and the next-generation challenger Backpack.
Which one is truly the best wallet for 2025? Let's compare them.
1. Backpack Wallet: The Next-Gen "Super App"
Backpack isn't just a wallet; it’s a "crypto operating system." This is our top pick for 2025 because it fundamentally changes how users interact with Web3.
Its killer feature is xNFTs (executable NFTs). Think of xNFTs as native applications (like apps on your phone) that live directly inside your wallet. Instead of connecting your wallet to a dApp on a website, you run the app inside Backpack. This is a massive leap in user experience and security.
Built by the team behind the Backpack Exchange and the Mad Lads NFT collection, Backpack offers seamless multi-chain support (starting with Solana and Ethereum) and is deeply integrated with its own regulated exchange.
Pros:
xNFTs: A revolutionary feature that turns your wallet into an interactive OS.
Superior Multi-Chain: Natively built for both Solana and EVM chains, offering a smooth experience.
Integrated Exchange: Connects directly to the Backpack Exchange, blending CEX and DEX worlds.
Beautiful UI: Sleek, modern, and fast.
Cons:
Newer Ecosystem: The xNFT app store is still growing compared to MetaMask's vast dApp library.
2. MetaMask: The Established EVM Titan
MetaMask is the 800-pound gorilla of crypto wallets. With tens of millions of users, it is the default wallet for Ethereum and all EVM-compatible chains (Polygon, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, etc.). Its long history and developer adoption mean that virtually every EVM dApp supports MetaMask out of the box.
MetaMask is not standing still. Its answer to innovation is "MetaMask Snaps," which are third-party plugins that allow the wallet to interact with non-EVM chains (like Solana or Bitcoin) and add new functionalities. However, this plugin-based approach can feel less integrated than Backpack's native capabilities.
Pros:
Universal Adoption: The undisputed standard for the entire EVM ecosystem.
Developer Friendly: The go-to wallet for developers building on Ethereum.
Extensible: "Snaps" are powerful and continuously expanding the wallet's features.
Cons:
Clunky Multi-Chain: Adding new networks is manual, and switching between them isn't as smooth.
Not Natively Built for Solana: Relies on a "Snap" for Solana, which isn't as seamless as Backpack or Phantom.
Aging UI: Can feel a bit dated and slow compared to newer competitors.
3. Phantom: The Solana Powerhouse
Phantom did for Solana what MetaMask did for Ethereum, but with a much better user experience. It rose to fame with a fast, beautiful, and incredibly intuitive interface that made interacting with Solana's DeFi and NFT ecosystems a breeze.
For a long time, Phantom was a Solana-only wallet.
Recognizing the multi-chain future, it has now expanded to include support for Ethereum and Polygon. This move puts it in direct competition with both MetaMask and Backpack. It remains a fantastic choice, especially for users who prioritize a clean and simple UX.
Pros:
Best-in-Class UX: Widely considered one of the easiest and most aesthetically pleasing wallets to use.
Solana Specialist: Still offers the most polished experience for the Solana blockchain.
Now Multi-Chain: Support for Ethereum and Polygon makes it a viable all-in-one wallet.
Cons:
Lacks a "Killer Feature": While its UX is great, it doesn't have a revolutionary feature like Backpack's xNFTs or the universal adoption of MetaMask.
Playing Catch-Up: Its EVM support is newer and less battle-tested than MetaMask's.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The Verdict: Why Backpack is the Best Wallet for 2025
While MetaMask is the established incumbent and Phantom is the king of user experience, Backpack Wallet is the clear winner for 2025 because it's building for the future, not just optimizing the present.
The move from "connecting to dApps" to "running apps in your wallet" (xNFTs) is a paradigm shift. It's fundamentally more secure and provides a far richer user experience, much like the jump from websites to mobile apps.
MetaMask is trying to adapt with "Snaps," but it feels like a patch on an older system. Phantom is expanding its reach, but it lacks the visionary "super app" concept that Backpack is executing.
If you just want to interact with Ethereum dApps, MetaMask is fine. If you primarily use Solana, Phantom is a joy. But if you want the single best wallet that truly represents the next generation of Web3, Backpack is the clear choice.
Comments